Tech & Innovation
ChatGPT vs. NCI: analyzing the quality of cancer information on myths and misconceptions
28 Mar, 2023 | 15:00h | UTCNews Release: Looking for cancer information: Can ChatGPT be counted on? – Huntsman Cancer Institute
M-A | eHealth-based psychosocial interventions for adults with insomnia
23 Mar, 2023 | 12:31h | UTC
RCT | Electronic nudges resulted in modest increase in influenza vaccination uptake in older adults
22 Mar, 2023 | 13:10h | UTCElectronic nudges to increase influenza vaccination uptake in Denmark: a nationwide, pragmatic, registry-based, randomised implementation trial – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
News Release: Electronic Messages Improved Influenza Vaccination Rates in Nationwide Danish Study – Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Commentary: Linking Flu Vaccine to Cardiovascular Benefit Could Increase Uptake in Older Adults – HCP Live
M-A | Artificial intelligence for hip fracture detection and outcome prediction
20 Mar, 2023 | 13:13h | UTC
Advantages and challenges of using telehealth for home-based palliative care | Systematic mixed studies review
16 Mar, 2023 | 13:14h | UTC
RCT | Immersive virtual reality intervention reduces pain among pediatric patients undergoing venipuncture
15 Mar, 2023 | 14:46h | UTCCommentary: Immersive Virtual Reality Beneficial for Children Undergoing Venipuncture – HealthDay
Study shows potential for autonomous reporting of normal chest radiographs using artificial intelligence
13 Mar, 2023 | 14:41h | UTCAutonomous Chest Radiograph Reporting Using AI: Estimation of Clinical Impact – Radiology
News Release: AI accurately identifies normal and abnormal chest x-rays – Radiological Society of North America
Commentary: AI Has High Sensitivity for Abnormal Chest Radiographs – HealthDay
Commentary on Twitter
In a multicenter retrospective study of 1529 consecutive radiographs from adult patients, depending on referral setting, between 6% and 12% of all radiographs could potentially be autonomously reported, with the highest rates in outpatients. https://t.co/SEumLlqJMA pic.twitter.com/r2yTgoUb4H
— Radiology (@radiology_rsna) March 9, 2023
RCT | Home telemonitoring vs. hospital care in complicated pregnancies in the Netherlands
9 Mar, 2023 | 13:58h | UTC
Commentary on Twitter
NEW Research investigating home #telemonitoring versus hospital care in complicated #pregnancy. Read it here: https://t.co/Cu5DvAgJ58@BekkerMN @hotelstudie @umcutrecht pic.twitter.com/wcTthWPaxK
— The Lancet Digital Health (@LancetDigitalH) February 23, 2023
Position Statement | Telemedicine in obstetrics — quality and safety considerations
8 Mar, 2023 | 14:23h | UTC
Commentary on Twitter
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Special Statement: Telemedicine in obstetrics—quality and safety considerations https://t.co/15knjAg4tc @MySMFM @acog #telemedicine pic.twitter.com/jUL7inHuu4
— AJOG (@AJOG_thegray) March 7, 2023
Perspective | Artificial intelligence in medicine & ChatGPT: de-tether the physician
7 Mar, 2023 | 13:10h | UTCArtificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician – Journal of Medical Systems (if the link is paywalled, try this one)
Related:
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
ChatGPT has many uses. Experts explore what this means for healthcare and medical research
7 Mar, 2023 | 13:11h | UTCRelated:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician – Journal of Medical Systems (if the link is paywalled, try this one)
Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
Perspective | MRI for all: portable low-field scanners could revolutionize medical imaging in nations rich and poor — if doctors embrace them
3 Mar, 2023 | 13:53h | UTCMRI FOR ALL: Portable low-field scanners could revolutionize medical imaging in nations rich and poor—if doctors embrace them – Science (a few articles per month are free)
Virtual wards: a rapid evidence synthesis and implications for the care of older people
1 Mar, 2023 | 13:52h | UTC
Cluster RCT | Effectiveness of an intensive care telehealth program to improve process quality
28 Feb, 2023 | 13:31h | UTC
Commentary on Twitter
? A structured, bundled telemedical quality improvement implemented in a local network of?? hospitals improved quality of acute #ICU care vs to standard of care, increasing adherence to evidence-based performance indicators.
Open #FOAMc on @yourICM
? https://t.co/WV56tXoiHM pic.twitter.com/YQQvm2HUO5— Intensive Care Medicine (@yourICM) January 16, 2023
Perspective | Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing?
27 Feb, 2023 | 13:09h | UTCCan artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? – Critical Care
Related:
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
Artificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance
27 Feb, 2023 | 13:07h | UTCArtificial intelligence in academic writing: a paradigm-shifting technological advance – Nature Reviews Urology (free for a limited period)
Commentary on Twitter
Artificial Intelligence will not replace academics, but academics who use AI will replace those who do not.
-We should discuss boundaries/ethical issues!@NatRevUrol @OncoAlert @Roei_Golan7 @AkhilMuthigi @ranjithramamd @VincentRK @VPrasadMDMPH #ChatGPT https://t.co/neAtxrRXI8 pic.twitter.com/gOpzbdg1mO— Yüksel Ürün (@DrYukselUrun) February 26, 2023
Related:
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
ChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
Digital health interventions for adult patients with cancer evaluated in randomized controlled trials: scoping review
16 Feb, 2023 | 14:45h | UTC
M-A | Cost-effectiveness of internet interventions compared with treatment as usual for people with mental disorders
16 Feb, 2023 | 14:43h | UTC
Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models
14 Feb, 2023 | 11:00h | UTCSummary: The researchers evaluated the performance of ChatGPT, a large language-based AI, on the United States Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE). The USMLE is a set of three standardized tests required for medical licensure in the US. The results showed that ChatGPT performed at or near the passing threshold (60%) on all three exams without specialized training or reinforcement. The AI also demonstrated a high level of concordance and insight in its explanations, suggesting that it may have potential to assist with medical education and potentially, clinical decision-making in the future. This marks a notable milestone in AI maturation and increased confidence in its trust and explainability.
(By ChatGPT, reviewed and edited)
News Release: ChatGPT can (almost) pass the US Medical Licensing Exam – PLOS
Commentaries:
Commentary from one of the authors on Twitter (thread – click for more)
our work showing that ChatGPT passed the US Medical Licensing Exam (USMLE) is published @PLOSDigiHealth!
there's tons of chatter about LLMs in healthcare.
AI is not going to replace doctors anytime soon, but here are the key takeaways from this work:
? https://t.co/OQs2Tlfwjx pic.twitter.com/v3UWjScLth
— Morgan Cheatham (@morgancheatham) February 13, 2023
Perspective | ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: is the future suddenly here?
14 Feb, 2023 | 10:59h | UTCSummary: The article discusses the potential of ChatGPT, a new AI chatbot, to revolutionize medical diagnosis. It compares ChatGPT’s performance with that of symptom checkers and physicians, finding that it performs better than symptom checkers and is approaching the accuracy of physicians. The article highlights the limitations of the study, including the small sample size and sensitivity of results to the way information is presented. It also acknowledges potential challenges with the use of AI in medical diagnosis, including the need for more rigorous testing, the issue of feeding patient information into an algorithm, and the possibility of AI algorithms being biased. Despite these challenges, the article suggests that the future of computer-assisted diagnosis is here and the healthcare system will need to address these challenges.
(By ChatGPT, reviewed and edited)
Source: ChatGPT-assisted diagnosis: Is the future suddenly here? – STAT
Perspective | Generating scholarly content with ChatGPT: ethical challenges for medical publishing
14 Feb, 2023 | 10:58h | UTCSummary: The article discusses the ethical challenges posed by the use of ChatGPT, an AI chatbot, in medical publishing. The authors note that the impact of generative AI on medical publishing is currently unknown, but it could have substantial ethical implications, including copyright, attribution, plagiarism, and authorship issues. The authors argue that there is a growing need for robust AI author guidelines in scholarly publishing, and that the International Association of Scientific, Technical, and Medical Publishers has produced a white paper on AI ethics. They also raise concerns about the potential for ChatGPT to widen existing disparities in knowledge dissemination and scholarly publishing, as well as the potential for the chatbot to produce misleading or inaccurate content. The authors call on The Lancet Digital Health and the Lancet family to initiate discussions around the implications of AI-generated content within scholarly publishing and to create comprehensive guidance.
(By ChatGPT, reviewed and edited)
Development of a machine learning model for sonographic assessment of gestational age
14 Feb, 2023 | 10:30h | UTCCommentary: AI Models Have Higher Accuracy for Estimating Gestational Age – HealthDay
Video | ChatGPT: will it transform the world of health care?
13 Feb, 2023 | 12:55h | UTCChatGPT: Will It Transform the World of Health Care? – UCSF Department of Medicine
Related:
ChatGPT and the future of medical writing (ChatGPT itself wrote this paper)
ChatGPT: five priorities for research – Nature
The path forward for ChatGPT in academia – Lumo’s Newsletter
ChatGPT is fun, but not an author – Science
Tools such as ChatGPT threaten transparent science; here are our ground rules for their use – Nature
ChatGPT listed as author on research papers: many scientists disapprove – Nature
Abstracts written by ChatGPT fool scientists
RCT | AI improves nodule detection on chest radiographs in a health screening population
10 Feb, 2023 | 13:55h | UTCNews Release: AI Improves Lung Nodule Detection on Chest X-Rays – RSNA News
Machine learning-based marker for coronary artery disease: derivation and validation in two longitudinal cohorts
8 Feb, 2023 | 12:14h | UTCMachine learning-based marker for coronary artery disease: derivation and validation in two longitudinal cohorts – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)
News Release: Digital marker for coronary artery disease built by researchers at Mount Sinai
Commentary: Machine learning used to generate a new holistic model for coronary artery disease – News Medical
Commentary from the author on Twitter (thread – click for more)
Christmas came early… my first paper of my postdoc is officially published @TheLancet!! https://t.co/pozEyRKkD0
This was a wild journey with the @DoGenetics lab to build a digital marker for heart disease using AI + electronic health records?? Here's why:
1/?— Iain S. Forrest, PhD (@IainSForrest) December 21, 2022