Open access
Open access
Powered by Google Translator Translator

Oncology (all articles)

Clinical validation of a cell-free DNA test for colorectal cancer screening: sensitivity and specificity analysis

20 Mar, 2024 | 19:16h | UTC

Study Design and Population: This study conducted a clinical validation of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) blood-based test to screen for colorectal cancer in a cohort of 10,258 individuals, 7,861 of whom met the eligibility criteria and were evaluable. The research aimed to assess the test’s performance by comparing its sensitivity for detecting colorectal cancer and its specificity for identifying advanced neoplasia (including colorectal cancer or advanced precancerous lesions) against the outcomes of screening colonoscopy, a standard procedure.

Main Findings: The cfDNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 83.1% for detecting colorectal cancer, with stage-specific sensitivities of 87.5% for stages I-III cancers. However, its sensitivity for identifying advanced precancerous lesions was notably lower at 13.2%. On the specificity front, the test showed an 89.6% ability to correctly identify individuals without any advanced colorectal neoplasia and had an overall specificity of 89.9% for those with a negative colonoscopy result, indicating no presence of colorectal cancer, advanced precancerous lesions, or non-advanced precancerous lesions.

Implications for Practice: The cfDNA blood-based test presents a promising tool for colorectal cancer screening, boasting substantial sensitivity for colorectal cancer detection and high specificity for advanced neoplasia. Its non-invasive nature could potentially enhance screening adherence, facilitating earlier cancer detection and possibly reducing colorectal cancer-related mortality. However, the test’s low sensitivity for advanced precancerous lesions suggests a need for further research and development to improve early detection capabilities.

Reference: Chung, D.C. et al. A Cell-free DNA Blood-Based Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Journal Name, Volume(Issue), Pages. Access the study here: [Link]


RCT: Effectiveness of mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation in reducing postoperative complications in elective rectal resection

20 Mar, 2024 | 18:18h | UTC

Study Design and Population

This double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial was conducted at three university hospitals in Finland, involving 565 patients aged 18 years and older undergoing elective rectal resection with primary anastomosis for tumors 15 cm or less from the anal verge, as determined by magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to either the mechanical and oral antibiotic bowel preparation (MOABP) group, receiving neomycin and metronidazole orally, or to the mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) plus placebo group, with all interventions occurring the day before surgery alongside standard preoperative intravenous antibiotics.

Main Findings

The study found that patients in the MOABP group experienced significantly fewer postoperative complications, with a median Comprehensive Complication Index significantly lower than that of the MBP plus placebo group. Additionally, the MOABP group showed reduced rates of surgical site infections (SSIs) and anastomotic dehiscence compared to the control group, demonstrating a clear benefit in postoperative outcomes.

Implications for Practice

The results of this trial suggest that incorporating oral antibiotics with mechanical bowel preparation prior to elective rectal resection significantly reduces postoperative complications, including SSIs and anastomotic dehiscence. Therefore, MOABP should be adopted as the standard regimen for patients undergoing these procedures to improve postoperative outcomes and reduce the burden of complications. This evidence underscores the importance of updating surgical protocols to include this preparation strategy.

Reference

Laura Koskenvuo et al. (2024). Randomized Clinical Trial: Effectiveness of Mechanical and Oral Antibiotic Bowel Preparation in Reducing Postoperative Complications in Elective Rectal Resection. JAMA Surg, Published online March 20, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0184. Access the study here: [Link]


Prospective Study: Enhanced detection of colorectal cancer and precancerous lesions with next-generation stool DNA testing

20 Mar, 2024 | 17:41h | UTC

Study Design and Population:

This prospective study evaluated the efficacy of a next-generation multitarget stool DNA test for colorectal cancer screening in asymptomatic adults aged 40 and older. The study encompassed 20,176 participants undergoing screening colonoscopy to determine the test’s sensitivity and specificity in detecting colorectal cancer and advanced neoplasia, including advanced precancerous lesions.

Main Findings:

The next-generation stool DNA test demonstrated a sensitivity of 93.9% for detecting colorectal cancer and a specificity of 90.6% for advanced neoplasia, significantly outperforming the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in sensitivity for both colorectal cancer and advanced precancerous lesions. However, the test showed slightly lower specificity for advanced neoplasia compared to FIT. No adverse events were reported, indicating the test’s safety for screening purposes.

Implications for Practice:

The findings suggest that the next-generation multitarget stool DNA test offers a superior option for colorectal cancer screening, with significantly higher sensitivity for detecting cancer and advanced precancerous lesions than the currently available FIT. This advance in non-invasive screening technology could lead to earlier detection and treatment of colorectal cancer, potentially improving patient outcomes. Further research may focus on optimizing the balance between sensitivity and specificity to enhance the clinical utility of stool DNA testing.

Reference:

Imperiale, T. F.et al, & BLUE-C Study Investigators (2024). Next-Generation Multitarget Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med, 390(11), 984-993. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2310336.


RCT | Superior PFS with avelumab vs. chemotherapy in second-line treatment for mCRC with microsatellite instability

11 Aug, 2023 | 15:25h | UTC

Avelumab vs Standard Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Microsatellite Instability: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology

See also: Visual Abstract

Commentary: Avelumab Outperforms Standard Second-Line Therapy in dMMR/MSI Metastatic CRC – Cancer Therapy Advisor

 


RCT – 2ry analysis | Aerobic exercise intervention shows potential to reduce chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

11 Aug, 2023 | 15:17h | UTC

Effect of Exercise on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Among Patients Treated for Ovarian Cancer: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Network Open

See also: Visual Abstract

Commentary: Aerobic Exercise Cuts Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms – HealthDay

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Phase 2 RCT | Adding stereotactic body radiotherapy to immune checkpoint inhibitors fails to improve outcomes in solid tumor patients

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:28h | UTC

Checkpoint Inhibitors in Combination With Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: The CHEERS Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

See also: Visual Abstract

Commentary: Addition of SBRT to Immunotherapy in Advanced Solid Tumors – The ASCO Post

 


Cohort Study | Moderate to heavy drinking linked to increased risk of early-onset colorectal cancer

9 Aug, 2023 | 15:27h | UTC

Sex and Tumor-Site Differences in the Association of Alcohol Intake With the Risk of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Commentary: Association of Alcohol Intake With Risk of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer – The ASCO Post

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Determination of “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer – A global assessment of 30 shades of grey

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:22h | UTC

Determination of “borderline resectable” pancreatic cancer – A global assessment of 30 shades of grey – HPB

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Systematic Review | Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:11h | UTC

Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin for relapsed epithelial ovarian cancer – Cochrane Library

 


Cohort Study | Potential negative survival impact of PPI and palbociclib co-administration in breast cancer patients

8 Aug, 2023 | 13:07h | UTC

Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Palbociclib Among Patients With Breast Cancer – JAMA Network Open

Commentary: Proton Pump Inhibitors May Compromise Efficacy of Palbociclib in Patients With Breast Cancer – Cancer Therapy Advisor

 


RCT | Upfront radiosurgery reduces tumor volume vs. a wait-and-scan approach in small- to medium-sized vestibular schwannoma

7 Aug, 2023 | 14:40h | UTC

Upfront Radiosurgery vs a Wait-and-Scan Approach for Small- or Medium-Sized Vestibular Schwannoma: The V-REX Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (free for a limited period)

See also: Visual Abstract

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX as potential first-line treatment for CLDN18.2+, HER2- advanced gastric adenocarcinoma

7 Aug, 2023 | 14:38h | UTC

Zolbetuximab plus CAPOX in CLDN18.2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized, phase 3 GLOW trial – Nature Medicine

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


RCT | Mammography screening with AI reduces workload by 44.3% without loss in detection efficacy

4 Aug, 2023 | 12:13h | UTC

Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study – The Lancet Oncology (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

News Release: First randomized trial finds AI-supported mammography screening is safe and almost halves radiologist workload – Lancet

Commentaries:

Large Mammography Study Shows Significant Benefits with AI-Aided Screening – Diagnostic Imaging

Expert reaction to interim safety analysis of randomised trial on AI-supported mammography screening – Science Media Centre

 


Study | Removal of thymus in adults linked to increased death, cancer incidence

4 Aug, 2023 | 12:09h | UTC

Health Consequences of Thymus Removal in Adults – New England Journal of Medicine (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

Commentaries:

Doctors have long considered the thymus expendable. But could removing it be fatal? – Science

The thymus withers away after puberty. But it may be important for adults – Science News

Thymus gland critical for adult health, study finds – News Medical

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


NICE Updated Guideline | Diagnosis and management of lung cancer

4 Aug, 2023 | 12:05h | UTC

Lung cancer: diagnosis and management – National Institute for Health and Care Excellence

 


ASCO Guideline Update | Management of Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

4 Aug, 2023 | 12:03h | UTC

Management of Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update – Journal of Clinical Oncology

Commentary: Rapid Guideline Update Offers Key Evidence-Based Recommendations for Stage III NSCLC Management – ASCO Daily News

 


ACP Guidance | Asymptomatic CRC screening advised from age 50 with fecal occult blood test every 2 years or colonoscopy every 10 years

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:48h | UTC

Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians – Annals of Internal Medicine

News Release: ACP issues updated guidance for colorectal cancer screening of asymptomatic adults – American College of Physicians

Commentary: Start screening for colorectal cancer at age 50 years, ACP suggests – ACP Internist

Summary for Patients: Screening for Colorectal Cancer in Asymptomatic Average-Risk Adults – Annals of Internal Medicine

 


Systematic Review | Interstitial lung disease incidence at 11.7% in metastatic breast cancer patients using trastuzumab deruxtecan

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:36h | UTC

Incidence of interstitial lung disease and cardiotoxicity with trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer patients: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis – ESMO Open

 


M-A | Significant QOL and mental health improvements in caregivers via targeted interventions

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:28h | UTC

Interventions to improve outcomes for caregivers of patients with advanced cancer: a meta-analysis – JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute

 


RCT | No significant recurrence-free survival improvement with everolimus post-renal carcinoma surgery

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:17h | UTC

Adjuvant everolimus after surgery for renal cell carcinoma (EVEREST): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 


RCT | Early oral antibiotic switch in low-risk neutropenic sepsis shows mixed results

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:15h | UTC

Early switch to oral antibiotic therapy in patients with low risk neutropenic sepsis (EASI-SWITCH): A randomized non-inferiority trial – Clinical Microbiology and Infection

 


Review | Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: Clinical cases and management strategies

3 Aug, 2023 | 13:07h | UTC

Atypical hyperplasia of the breast: Clinical cases and management strategies – Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine

 


RCT | Lazertinib offers 20.6-month of median PFS in EGFR-mutated NSCLC vs 9.7 months with gefitinib

2 Aug, 2023 | 13:55h | UTC

Lazertinib Versus Gefitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients With EGFR-Mutated Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Results From LASER301 – Journal of Clinical Medicine

 


RCT | Camrelizumab-rivoceranib outperforms sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable HCC

2 Aug, 2023 | 13:53h | UTC

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (CARES-310): a randomised, open-label, international phase 3 study – The Lancet (link to abstract – $ for full-text)

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


M-A | High-volume disease, T stage 4 show largest docetaxel benefit in prostate cancer

2 Aug, 2023 | 13:51h | UTC

Which patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer benefit from docetaxel: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised trials – The Lancet Oncology

Commentaries:

Meta-analysis of the Addition of Docetaxel to ADT in Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer – The ASCO Post

Disease Volume and T Stage Affect Docetaxel/ADT Efficacy in Prostate Cancer – Cancer Network

 

Commentary on Twitter

 


Stay Updated in Your Specialty

Telegram Channels
Free

WhatsApp alerts 10-day free trial

No spam, just news.