Infectious Diseases (all articles)
Systematic Review: Comparing antibiotic treatment vs. appendectomy for the initial treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis – Cochrane Library
4 May, 2024 | 13:09h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This Cochrane review analyzed 13 randomized controlled trials involving 3,358 participants to compare the efficacy of antibiotic treatment versus appendectomy in managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The included studies predominantly involved adult participants and utilized broad-spectrum antibiotics, with interventions ranging from open to predominantly laparoscopic appendectomy. Data collection spanned from hospital admission to up to seven years, with studies conducted across various global regions, including Asia, Europe, and North America.
Main Findings:
The primary outcomes revealed that antibiotic treatment might slightly increase the risk of unsuccessful treatment with 76 additional unsuccessful cases per 1,000 individuals compared to surgery, though these results did not reach clinical significance. Antibiotics reduced wound infections but possibly increased the average hospital stay by half a day. About 30.7% of participants treated with antibiotics required an appendectomy within one year. Secondary outcomes showed very uncertain evidence on antibiotics’ effect on intra-abdominal abscess or reoperation rates, and a slight increase in negative appendectomy rates was observed.
Implications for Practice:
The findings suggest that while antibiotics could serve as an initial treatment to avoid surgery in two-thirds of cases annually, a significant portion may still require surgical intervention. This information is crucial for clinicians in making informed treatment decisions, particularly considering patient preferences and the risk of surgery. Further research is needed to explore long-term outcomes and identify patient subgroups that may benefit most from either treatment.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
Diagnostic Study: Enhanced prediction of TB progression with IGRAs compared to tuberculin skin test
27 Apr, 2024 | 18:53h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This prospective diagnostic study analyzed the predictive accuracy of tuberculosis (TB) tests among 22,020 high-risk participants across 10 US sites from 2012 to 2020. Participants included individuals with close contacts to infectious TB cases, those born in or travelers to high-incidence countries, individuals living with HIV, or belonging to locally prevalent high-risk groups. Testing included two interferon-γ release assays (IGRAs), QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) and SPOT.TB (TSPOT), alongside the traditional tuberculin skin test (TST).
Main Findings:
The study found that both IGRAs, TSPOT and QFT-GIT, showed significantly superior positive predictive value (PPV) for predicting TB disease progression compared to the TST, with PPV ratios of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.35-2.02) and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.22-1.77) respectively. Additionally, when considering a positive TST result, further positive results from either IGRA significantly increased the PPV, emphasizing the enhanced predictive capability of IGRAs over TST alone.
Implications for Practice:
The superior predictive performance of Interferon-γ Release Assays (IGRAs) suggests they should be considered in clinical settings for high-risk populations, if available and feasible, to better identify individuals at increased risk of progressing to active tuberculosis (TB). This enhanced detection capability could guide more targeted preventive treatments, ultimately supporting global efforts toward TB elimination. Clinicians should assess the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of IGRAs to refine decision-making processes in TB prevention strategies, ensuring that the benefits of these advanced diagnostics are balanced against their costs.
Reference (free full-text):
WHO report on HIV drug resistance – Rising dolutegravir resistance and implications for global care standards
27 Apr, 2024 | 16:08h | UTCThe World Health Organization’s latest HIV Drug Resistance Report highlights both the effectiveness and emerging challenges with dolutegravir (DTG)-based therapies. While there is significant suppression of HIV viral loads in populations treated with DTG, data reveals increasing resistance levels, particularly among those with high viral loads and prior treatment experiences. The report calls for enhanced surveillance and management strategies to address these resistance patterns and maintain treatment efficacy. It also underscores the necessity of robust data systems and proactive healthcare policies to improve the overall quality of HIV treatment and prevent the transmission of resistant HIV strains, aligning with global efforts to combat antimicrobial resistance.
Source:
New report documents increase in HIV drug resistance to dolutegravir – World Health Organization
M-A: Reduced risk of infective endocarditis following dental procedures with antibiotic prophylaxis in high-risk individuals
26 Apr, 2024 | 12:07h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis on the incidence of infective endocarditis following invasive dental procedures. Researchers analyzed data from 1,152,345 cases sourced from PubMed, Cochrane-CENTRAL, Scopus, and other databases up to May 2023. The study included various research designs, such as case-control, cohort, and time-trend studies, assessing the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis across different risk groups.
Main Findings:
The meta-analysis revealed that antibiotic prophylaxis significantly lowers the risk of infective endocarditis among individuals at high risk (pooled relative risk, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.29-0.57), with consistent findings across studies of good quality. However, the effectiveness of prophylaxis in individuals at moderate or low/unknown risk remains unsupported by sufficient evidence. Time-trend studies provided mixed results, with some indicating no change or an increase in infective endocarditis incidence post-guideline changes in 2007.
Implications for Practice:
The findings support the continued use of antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk individuals undergoing invasive dental procedures, aligning with current guidelines from the American Heart Association and European Society of Cardiology. The lack of clear benefits in moderate and low-risk groups suggests a need for further research to optimize prophylaxis guidelines and ensure effective risk stratification in clinical practice.
Reference (link to abstract – $ for full-text):
RCT: Lack of significant effect of Paxlovid (nirmatrelvir–ritonavir) on symptom alleviation in Covid-19
26 Apr, 2024 | 11:49h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This phase 2–3 randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of nirmatrelvir in combination with ritonavir for treating mild-to-moderate Covid-19 in adults. Participants, both vaccinated and unvaccinated, were enrolled based on their risk factors for severe Covid-19. The study included 1296 adults who had confirmed Covid-19 with symptom onset within the past 5 days. They were randomly assigned to receive either nirmatrelvir–ritonavir or placebo every 12 hours for 5 days.
Main Findings:
The primary endpoint was the time to sustained alleviation of all targeted Covid-19 signs and symptoms. Results showed that the median time to alleviation was 12 days for the treatment group and 13 days for the placebo group, a difference that was not statistically significant (P=0.60). Hospitalizations and deaths were slightly lower in the treatment group (0.8%) compared to the placebo group (1.6%), but this difference was also not statistically significant. Adverse events were similar across both groups, with dysgeusia and diarrhea being the most common in the treatment group.
Implications for Practice:
The findings indicate that nirmatrelvir–ritonavir treatment does not significantly reduce the time to symptom alleviation for Covid-19 compared to placebo among vaccinated or unvaccinated adults. These results suggest that further research is needed to explore the potential benefits of this treatment in specific subpopulations or in combination with other interventions.
Reference (free full-text):
FDA approves antibiotic Zevtera (ceftobiprole medocaril sodium) for three indications
26 Apr, 2024 | 11:39h | UTCThe FDA has granted approval for Zevtera (ceftobiprole medocaril sodium), an antibiotic formulated for injection, targeting three key bacterial infections. This includes treatment for adults with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (SAB) with or without right-sided infective endocarditis, acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in both adults and pediatric patients aged three months to under 18 years.
The approval follows rigorous clinical trials demonstrating Zevtera’s efficacy. In a multicenter study for SAB, Zevtera achieved a 69.8% success rate, slightly outperforming the comparator drug. For ABSSSI, Zevtera showed a 91.3% early clinical response, and for CABP, it had a clinical cure rate of 76.4% in adults. Pediatric efficacy for CABP was extrapolated from adult data and supported by a smaller pediatric trial.
Common side effects include anemia, nausea, and increased liver enzyme levels, with specific reactions varying by infection treated. Contraindications include severe hypersensitivity to ceftobiprole or other cephalosporins. Zevtera also carries warnings about potential hypersensitivity reactions, central nervous system effects, and Clostridioides difficile-associated diarrhea.
This approval, supported by Priority Review and Fast Track designations, offers a new treatment option for clinicians managing these serious infections.
Source: FDA NEWS RELEASE: FDA Approves New Antibiotic for Three Different Uses
Cohort Study: Inappropriate pneumonia diagnoses and associated risks in 17,290 hospitalized adults
26 Apr, 2024 | 11:25h | UTCStudy Design and Population:
This prospective cohort study analyzed medical records and patient interactions from July 2017 to March 2020 across 48 Michigan hospitals. A total of 17,290 adults admitted for general care were retrospectively assessed for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) treatment, focusing on those who received antibiotics within the first two days of hospitalization.
Main Findings:
The study identified that 12.0% of the patients were inappropriately diagnosed with CAP. Key risk factors for misdiagnosis included older age, presence of dementia, and altered mental status at presentation. Among those misdiagnosed, 87.6% underwent a full course of antibiotics, which did not significantly change the 30-day risk of mortality, readmission, emergency visits, or Clostridioides difficile infections compared to brief treatment but was associated with higher antibiotic-related adverse events.
Implications for Practice:
The findings underscore the prevalence of inappropriate pneumonia diagnosis among hospitalized adults, especially in older patients with specific geriatric conditions. This study highlights the potential harms of unnecessary antibiotic use, suggesting a need for improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment decision-making in hospital settings to mitigate adverse outcomes.
Reference (free full-text):
RCT: Clarithromycin improves early clinical and inflammatory responses in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia patients
23 Mar, 2024 | 20:25h | UTCStudy Design and Population: The ACCESS trial was a phase 3, prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial conducted in 18 Greek hospitals, involving adults hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia who displayed systemic inflammatory response syndrome, had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score of 2 or more, and procalcitonin levels of 0.25 ng/mL or more. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either standard of care with intravenous cephalosporins or β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations plus oral clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily for 7 days) or placebo. The trial aimed to evaluate the impact of clarithromycin on early clinical and inflammatory responses.
Main Findings: Among 278 participants allocated to clarithromycin (n=139) or placebo (n=139), the primary composite endpoint—indicating early clinical response and inflammatory burden reduction within 72 hours—was met by 68% of patients in the clarithromycin group compared to 38% in the placebo group, showcasing a significant difference (29.6%, odds ratio 3.40, p<0.0001). Serious treatment-emergent adverse events were slightly lower in the clarithromycin group than in the placebo group, although not statistically significant.
Implications for Practice: The addition of clarithromycin to the standard of care for hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia significantly improves early clinical response and reduces inflammatory burden, potentially through modulation of the immune response. These results support the use of clarithromycin alongside β-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia, highlighting its role in enhancing patient outcomes by targeting early clinical and inflammatory indicators.
Reference
Prof Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis, MD et al. (2024). Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, Volume(Issue), Pages. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Access the study here: Link
RCT: Lower oxygenation target improves days alive without life support in severe COVID-19 hypoxemia
21 Mar, 2024 | 13:46h | UTCStudy Design and Population: This multicenter randomized clinical trial investigated the impact of different oxygenation targets on the survival of adult patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia in the ICU. Conducted across 11 European ICUs from August 2020 to March 2023, the study involved 726 patients requiring at least 10 L/min of oxygen or mechanical ventilation. Participants were randomly assigned to receive an oxygenation target of either 60 mm Hg (lower oxygenation group, n=365) or 90 mm Hg (higher oxygenation group, n=361) for up to 90 days.
Main Findings: The primary outcome was the number of days alive without life support at 90 days post-intervention. Patients in the lower oxygenation group achieved a median of 80.0 days alive without life support compared to 72.0 days in the higher oxygenation group, a difference that was statistically significant (P=0.009). Although there was a slight reduction in mortality at 90 days in the lower oxygenation group (30.2% vs 34.7% in the higher group), this was not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients with serious adverse events or the number of days alive and out of hospital.
Implications for Practice: Targeting a lower Pao2 of 60 mm Hg in ICU patients with COVID-19 and severe hypoxemia appears to increase the days alive without life support compared to a higher target of 90 mm Hg, without increasing serious adverse events. This finding suggests that a lower oxygenation target could be more beneficial for this patient population, potentially guiding clinical practice in managing oxygen therapy for severe COVID-19 cases.
Reference
Reference: Nielsen FM et al. (2024). Randomized Clinical Trial: Effect of Oxygenation Targets on Survival Without Life Support in COVID-19 Patients with Severe Hypoxemia. JAMA, Published online March 19, 2024. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.2934. Access the study here: [Link]
RCT: Propafenone leads to quicker sinus rhythm restoration than amiodarone in supraventricular arrhythmias related to septic shock
1 Oct, 2023 | 15:19h | UTCStudy Design & Population: The research was a two-center, prospective, controlled parallel-group, double-blind trial involving 209 septic shock patients who had new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. Patients were randomized to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400–840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600–1800 mg/24 h).
Main Findings: The primary outcomes focused on the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm 24 hours post-infusion, time to the first sinus rhythm restoration, and arrhythmia recurrence rates. No significant difference was observed in 24-hour sinus rhythm rates between the propafenone (72.8%) and amiodarone (67.3%) groups (p=0.4). Time to the first rhythm restoration was significantly shorter for the propafenone group (median 3.7 hours) compared to the amiodarone group (median 7.3 hours, p=0.02). Recurrence of arrhythmia was notably lower in the propafenone group (52%) than in the amiodarone group (76%, p<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with a dilated left atrium, amiodarone appeared to be more effective.
Implications & Limitations: The study suggests that while propafenone doesn’t offer better rhythm control at 24 hours compared to amiodarone, it does provide faster cardioversion and fewer arrhythmia recurrences, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No significant differences were observed in clinical outcomes, such as ICU or long-term mortality, between propafenone and amiodarone in the trial. Limitations include potential underpowering of the study and the inability to fully account for the impact of multiple covariates involved in the complex therapy of septic shock.
Commentary on Twitter:
Propafenone?70 mg bolus+ 400-840 mg/24h vs amiodarone?300 mg + by 600-1800 mg/24h for SVA in septic shock, RCT
?propafenone not better for rhythm control at 24h but excellent hemodynamic safety profile, cardioverting faster & fewer recurrences#FOAMCc
?https://t.co/GVuoxPD7Hy pic.twitter.com/rRlj00x71p— Intensive Care Medicine (@yourICM) September 13, 2023
M-A | Most dengue infections are asymptomatic and could significantly contribute to the transmission of the disease
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:21h | UTC
Review | Artificial intelligence, machine learning and deep learning: Potential resources for the infection clinician
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:18h | UTC
M-A | Percutaneous catheter drainage superior to needle aspiration for liver abscess treatment success
9 Aug, 2023 | 15:12h | UTC
Multinational Study | No correlation between Covid-19 and onset of type 1 diabetes in children
8 Aug, 2023 | 13:32h | UTC
M-A | The global prevalence of human fascioliasis
8 Aug, 2023 | 13:10h | UTC
Perspective | Cardiac device infection: removing barriers to timely and adequate treatment
4 Aug, 2023 | 11:54h | UTC
Position Paper | Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in skin surgery
3 Aug, 2023 | 13:39h | UTCPerioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in skin surgery – Position paper of the Antibiotic Stewardship working group of the German Society for Dermatologic Surgery (DGDC) – Journal of the German Society of Dermatology
Part 1: Procedure- and patient-related risk factors
Part 2: Special indications and situations
RCT | Early oral antibiotic switch in low-risk neutropenic sepsis shows mixed results
3 Aug, 2023 | 13:15h | UTC
Consensus Paper | Diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis in adults
1 Aug, 2023 | 14:34h | UTC
Opinion | Bad science needs to be called out: the medical profession loses trust when bad studies are used to promote policy
1 Aug, 2023 | 14:29h | UTCBad Science Needs to Be Called Out – Sensible Medicine
Related: Did Republicans die more during the pandemic bc they didn’t get the vax? – By Dr. Vinay Prassad
Original Study: Excess Death Rates for Republican and Democratic Registered Voters in Florida and Ohio During the COVID-19 Pandemic – JAMA Internal Medicine
Critical Appraisal | Did Republicans die more during the pandemic bc they didn’t get the vax?
1 Aug, 2023 | 14:28h | UTCDid Republicans die more during the pandemic bc they didn’t get the vax? – By Dr. Vinay Prassad
Related: Bad Science Needs to Be Called Out – Sensible Medicine
Original Study: Excess Death Rates for Republican and Democratic Registered Voters in Florida and Ohio During the COVID-19 Pandemic – JAMA Internal Medicine
M-A | Updated evidence supports incisional negative pressure wound therapy for surgical site infection prevention
1 Aug, 2023 | 14:15h | UTC
Opinion Video | Critical analysis of the data behind Covid-19 booster shots
31 Jul, 2023 | 14:40h | UTCOriginal Publication: Correspondence | Potential “healthy vaccinee bias” in a study of BNT162b2 vaccine against Covid-19
RCT | Bictegravir regimen noninferior to dolutegravir regimen in HIV-1, HBV co-infection treatment
31 Jul, 2023 | 14:00h | UTC
RCT | Limited antibiotic efficacy in children with sinusitis lacking nasopharyngeal pathogens
27 Jul, 2023 | 13:08h | UTCIdentifying Children Likely to Benefit From Antibiotics for Acute Sinusitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial – JAMA (free for a limited period)
Editorial: Acute Bacterial Sinusitis: Limitations of Test-Based Treatment – JAMA (free for a limited period)
News Release: Bacterial testing in kids with sinusitis could slash antibiotic use – University of Pittsburgh
Commentary: Trial suggests bacterial test could reduce antibiotics in kids with sinusitis – CIDRAP
Commentary on Twitter
In children with acute sinusitis, antibiotic treatment had minimal benefit for those without nasopharyngeal bacterial pathogens. The antibiotic effect did not depend on the color of nasal discharge. https://t.co/hgRx1Qou53 pic.twitter.com/zYs8Mfbjjp
— JAMA (@JAMA_current) July 26, 2023