Editorial – “No Raw Data, No Science: Another Possible Source of the Reproducibility Crisis”

No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis – Molecular Brain (free)

Commentary: How a ‘no raw data, no science’ outlook can resolve the reproducibility crisis in science – by Fujita Health University (free)

Related: Can We Science Our Way out of the Reproducibility Crisis? – Absolutely Maybe Blog (free) AND Study: Evaluating the Replicability of Social Science Experiments (link to abstract and commentaries) AND Five ways to fix statistics – Nature (free) AND Make replication studies ‘a normal and essential part of science,’ Dutch science academy says – Science (free) AND Reproducibility of clinical research in critical care: a scoping review (free) AND Reproducibility Trial Publishes Two Conclusions for One Paper (free)

Related Commentary on Twitter

My editorial paper entitled, "No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis". When I feel the results are too beautiful, I requested raw data before sending it out for review. 40 out of 41 did not send me the right data.https://t.co/ve99RgkHMe pic.twitter.com/KyP60jZ8Mp

— Tsuyoshi Miyakawa (@tsuyomiyakawa) February 21, 2020